Yeah, but you're a part of that insignificant niche MF mini assemblage I was talking about. :=))
Jack --- On Wed, 4/28/10, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: K-7 replacement? > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 12:02 PM > Not for the majority of current APS-C > sensor users who have no > intention of going with the 645D form factor or or lens > investment. > (like me). > > Tom C. > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > The 645 dependency, being unique in the DSLR group, > would to a great extent satisfy, or would at least take off > the edge, of the limited FF craving. > > > > Jack > > > > --- On Wed, 4/28/10, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> From: Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> > >> Subject: Re: K-7 replacement? > >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > >> Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 10:22 AM > >> Largely because it *should* lead to > >> lower overall noise levels and I > >> can then use all my legacy lenses at the focal > lengths for > >> which I > >> purchased them. > >> > >> Aside from that, I believe Pentax should be > competing in > >> the 36x24 mm > >> format market, as Nikon, Canon, and Sony all do. > Their > >> flagship DSLR's > >> are all in that format. So Pentax *may*, *might*, > *probably > >> does* > >> appear to be the slouch of the 4 mfrs. (which of > course we > >> know is > >> true in numerous ways). Plus it would provide an > upgrade > >> path that was > >> not 645 dependent. > >> > >> Tom C. > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Miserere <miser...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > On 28 April 2010 13:03, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> FF would be nice... :-) > >> > > >> > Why do you want full-frame, Tom? > >> > > >> > > >> > --M. > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com > >> > > >> > http://EnticingTheLight.com > >> > A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment > >> > > >> > -- > >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> > PDML@pdml.net > >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit > the link > >> directly above and follow the directions. > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> PDML@pdml.net > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the > link > >> directly above and follow the directions. > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
