An absolutely "Darwinian" necessity!

--- On Wed, 4/28/10, William Robb <war...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: William Robb <war...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: K-7 replacement?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 10:18 AM
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "CheekyGeek"
> Subject: Re: K-7 replacement?
> 
> 
> > I would simply add that having your $500 camera
> out-perform your
> > flagship $1000 camera is a bit of embarrassment that
> must be rectified
> > with at minimum an upgrade version of the K7, if not
> an entirely new
> > model. In other words, if you take what you learned in
> creating the
> > K-x and put it in your flagship model, you've got a
> World-Beater.
> 
> To be fair, the K-x outperforms the K7 in only one
> parameter.
> Dropping the K-x sensor into a K7 body and calling it a new
> camera isn't viable since it would be going backwards in
> megapixels.
> I like Adam's idea of a 14mp Sony sensor, but I'd really
> like to see something closer to 18mp.
> 
> William Robb
> 
> 
> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 


      

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to