An absolutely "Darwinian" necessity! --- On Wed, 4/28/10, William Robb <war...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: William Robb <war...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: K-7 replacement? > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 10:18 AM > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "CheekyGeek" > Subject: Re: K-7 replacement? > > > > I would simply add that having your $500 camera > out-perform your > > flagship $1000 camera is a bit of embarrassment that > must be rectified > > with at minimum an upgrade version of the K7, if not > an entirely new > > model. In other words, if you take what you learned in > creating the > > K-x and put it in your flagship model, you've got a > World-Beater. > > To be fair, the K-x outperforms the K7 in only one > parameter. > Dropping the K-x sensor into a K7 body and calling it a new > camera isn't viable since it would be going backwards in > megapixels. > I like Adam's idea of a 14mp Sony sensor, but I'd really > like to see something closer to 18mp. > > William Robb > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.