> Note that I said N's entry "validated _a_ market", but I didn't say it > was a market of which I was a part. I suspect the validated market may > be largely made up of young Japanese women. Pentax recently tested those > waters with the candy coloured, Hello Kittied K-r/K-x's. Market > researchers must have given a big thumbs up. > > I too am not going to be buying a Q or a V1. I'd be more likely to buy a > 645D. > > -bmw >
OK, I understand. :-) What I don't understand is the apparent assumption that a person in the market for this type of diminutive sensor size camera (implies image quality is not at the top of their priority list) would actually care that it has interchangeable lenses (implies image quality IS a high priority). Could it be this is a way of attracting current P&S owners to upgrade into the more lucrative mirrorless and DSLR markets, by offering a move up that is close in size to a P&S (at least with a standard wide-angle lens)? Tom -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
