On 22/09/2011 10:10 AM, Tom C wrote:
No doubt she hasn't, but one can infer to some degree from the specs.
Really, just about any modern digital camera on the market has
*acceptable* image quality within a certain set of parameters. My
Canon S90 and G10 which have small sensors have excellent image
quality for the shooting circumstances and purposes for which I use
them. Compared to my NEX-5 their limitations easily become evident.
I'm sure the Q will also produce excellent images within a defined set
of parameters.
I suspect the Q will be completely adequate in the good light conditions
that most travel photos are made with.
The issue to now was how an $800 camera with such a small sensor would
fair against similar 4/3 and APS-C offerings that have similar or even
lower price points. The answer will no doubt be that it's a nice
camera, but not alot of bang for the buck (at $800) compared to some
of the competition.
Tom C.
It really depends on how you base your decisions, doesn't it.
the things that hold me back from the Q are it's size (it's too small
for my hands) and my preference for viewfinders.
If the Q had a next generation EVF along with it's next generation
sensor, I would probably have bought one a few days ago.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
