She is writing a lot about the Q's image quality. Have she tried it? If not, I don't think she is much to rely on.
A few comments I saw about the Nikon: "I handled the J1 today, and did a review for Adorama of the Q. To be honest Steve, the Q is light years ahead in usability, and feels as solid as a brick thanks to it’s construction. The J1 felt literally like a plastic toy in my hand and gave me zero confidence in handling it" http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2011/09/21/nikon-enters-the-game-with-the-new-mirrorless-j1-and-v1-cameras/ Stig Vidar Hovland ________________________________________ Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] på vegne av Tom C [caka...@gmail.com] Sendt: 21. september 2011 18:06 Til: pdml@pdml.net Emne: Re: Q design "validated" by Nikon's entry? This zdnet article (link below) pretty much sums up my thoughts on the Q http://www.zdnet.com/blog/digitalcameras/pentax-q-smallest-compact-interchangeable-lens-camera-sports-biggest-price-tag/5084?tag=mantle_skin;content Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
