Assuming I'm the below-mentioned Steve, I've heard that myself, at least about the quality of the Q. Honestly folks, the only validation of either camera will be sales. Even if we don't like these cameras, if they sell to any demographic they they are a success. I have no prediction abut sales, of course, but I've been surprise before.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:13 AM, SV Hovland <pdml...@heime.org> wrote: > She is writing a lot about the Q's image quality. Have she tried it? If not, > I don't think she is much to rely on. > > A few comments I saw about the Nikon: > "I handled the J1 today, and did a review for Adorama of the Q. To be honest > Steve, the Q is light years ahead in usability, and feels as solid as a brick > thanks to it’s construction. The J1 felt literally like a plastic toy in my > hand and gave me zero confidence in handling it" > http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2011/09/21/nikon-enters-the-game-with-the-new-mirrorless-j1-and-v1-cameras/ > > > Stig Vidar Hovland > > ________________________________________ > Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] på vegne av Tom C > [caka...@gmail.com] > Sendt: 21. september 2011 18:06 > Til: pdml@pdml.net > Emne: Re: Q design "validated" by Nikon's entry? > > This zdnet article (link below) pretty much sums up my thoughts on the > Q > > http://www.zdnet.com/blog/digitalcameras/pentax-q-smallest-compact-interchangeable-lens-camera-sports-biggest-price-tag/5084?tag=mantle_skin;content > > Tom C. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
