Dave,
The first thing they destroy is Police Cars, doesn't make sense to incite them.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:56 AM, David Mann <dmann...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 29, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>> The employment issue might be relevant.
>> You could wear a hat, sunglasses, and a hospital mask as a disguise,
>> but the goggles are teargas protection, maybe the bandanna as well.
>
> I don't see a problem with protestors protecting themselves against teargas.
>
>> I was in Chicago for the Democratic National Convention of '68.
>> I think these people wanted to recreate that atmosphere this year.
>> I praise the Chicago Police Department for being cool despite the taunting 
>> and
>> attempts to provoke them for media coverage.
>
> It's apparently common for bunches of undercover police to join a protest and 
> start trying to incite the other protestors to riot, thus making them look 
> like violent thugs in the media.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to