On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:33 PM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> The incremental increase in pixel count & the better auto-focus with > lenses I don't have and am not going to buy don't impress me. Nor the > other "improvements". The weather resistance would be nice to have but > by itself does not add enough value to make me want it. As somebody who is still stuck with a K10D, what appeals to me most about the K-5 is none of those things you list; it's the low noise, high-ISO capability, and dynamic range (three sides of the same coin). That's what drops my jaw when I see people's K-5 shots. I'm surprised that you're not even impressed enough to make note of it. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
