thanks leo
now i can sleep
ds
_______________________________________________________________________
Integrated Controls, Inc. Tel: 415-647-0480 EXT 107
2851 21st Street Fax: 415-647-3003
San Francisco, CA 94110 www.integratedcontrolsinc.com
Leo Potjewijd wrote:
At 08/10/05 05:45, Dennis Saputelli wrote:
this is potentially embarassing but ...
i (apparently, i think) have always had 'software arcs' checked in
gerber plot in 99SE
at least this is what a few .CAM files showed
never had a problem with polygons which i use all the time
should i worry to continue on this way ?
i am using 'raster' unsorted
No problem there. The lethal combination is 'hardware' arcs AND vector
sorted....
You _might_run into a clearance issue, but that will depend on the
fabhouse rules for surcharge on small clearances.
One of my fabhouses charges extra for clearance under 5 mils so I have a
general clearance design rule set to 5 mils. But when I used software
arcs the actual clearance in the Gerbers turne dout te be smaller than
that. There was a little extra time so I re-generated the Gerbers with
software arcs unchecked to keep the cost down.
Leo
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]
Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
