> On Nov 26, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Edwina Taborsky <tabor...@primus.ca> wrote: > > Again, Peirce uses the term of 'sign' to refer to both the Representamen and > the full triadic set of relations. You have to be careful of the context to > figure out which one he is referring to.
This is definitely true and can throw one off. I sometimes try to use the term token rather than sign to refer to the sign-term to distinguish it from the object and interpretant. Although that has its own difficulties. (It tends to bias people toward visual signs)
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
