So I'm guessing “ping” is the individual and “pong” is the universal — or is that also up for dispute?
But I remember this quandary from quandary mechanics ... https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2014/08/02/%e2%98%af-quantum-mechanics-%e2%98%af/ Cheers, Jon On 1/25/2017 10:28 PM, Stephen C. Rose wrote: > > Peirce was more than a pingpong ball in a long and repetitive > exegetical battle involving I suppose the core group of this > forum. But I have had enough. I simply will not open mail > from the correspondents until something that is not a binary > ether-or argument that dwells on "what Peirce thinks" as > though he has not changed himself in a century. Sorry > for the rant and if I am alone in my reaction then > I will willingly confess to having lost patience > and being somewhat saddened by it all. Best, S > > Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU > -- academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
