John, List,
I think so, after your proof!
Best, Helmut
08. April 2017 um 21:57 Uhr
"John F Sowa" <s...@bestweb.net>
"John F Sowa" <s...@bestweb.net>
On 4/8/2017 2:59 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote:
> I would say, that the instantiation of a law is not it´s token,
> but the law itself at work.
I agree.
> So law is all type, there are no tokens of it in inanimate world
> of efficient causation. Is my guess.
For a law of science, the proposition that states the law would
be a token.
For a law of nature, I agree that we could never observe a token.
But does that mean no token can exist? What would existence mean
for such a thing? Perhaps you could call it logos. As John the
Evangelist said, "The logos is God." Does God exist?
John
> I would say, that the instantiation of a law is not it´s token,
> but the law itself at work.
I agree.
> So law is all type, there are no tokens of it in inanimate world
> of efficient causation. Is my guess.
For a law of science, the proposition that states the law would
be a token.
For a law of nature, I agree that we could never observe a token.
But does that mean no token can exist? What would existence mean
for such a thing? Perhaps you could call it logos. As John the
Evangelist said, "The logos is God." Does God exist?
John
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
