--- "Mr. Nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Michael Lazzaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I don't know about anyone else, but *I'm* planning on making 
> > many, many Unicode synonyms, to make my code shorter and more readable.
> > 
> > For example, C<for> is too long, so I want to just make it curly-f, 
> > (Æ’).  And C<when> is even longer, so I'm going to use something else, 
> > probably lowercase omega (ω).
> > 
> > The numbers-in-a-circle characters can be used for array options.  
> > Instead of @array[3], I'll be saying @arrayâz<caron>Œ.  And @arrayâ‘¢
> will
> mean 
> > "every element of the array except for the third."
> > 
> > I'm still looking for the Unicode sad-faced-clown-on-fire character.  
> > When I find it, I think I'm gonna make it mean C<shift>.  Well, that or 
> > C<unshift>, I can't decide.  It depends on how sad the clown looks.
> > 
> > MikeL
> >
> 
> I think this is a great idea. Until now, it's been possible to read other
> people's code, so companies can fire a programmer and still have people who
> can read their code. Now employees will be able to be as bad as they want
> and
> nobody will be able to fire them. Job security through Unicode!
> 
> (Yes, that was sarcasm.)

Argh, I just realized the original was probably sarcastic too. Now I look
like an idiot. Well, moreso than before.


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Reply via email to