--- Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [*] People, we just *have* to find better names for these things! > I'd suggest we henceforth call them "value" properties (for > C<but>) and "referent" properties (for C<is>).
Hmm. According to this, C<return 0 is true;> would therefore be a malvalapropism, no? =Austin
