On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:52:22PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:46:43AM -0800, Austin Hastings wrote: > > Obviously, values are pure and therefrom spring "virtues," while > > objects are but vile clay -- fallible constructs of a sinful man, > > pathetically trying to recreate an envisioned ideal. Ergo, they have > > naught but "vices." > > > > Can I get an "Amen," brothers and sisters? > > I'm not sure. I thought about vices, but I can remember that Larry doesn't > like the idea of a "curse" function to un-bless things, so I suspect > that "vices" aren't going to see much favour. "flaws", maybe. There's > always scope for redeeming your flaws. :-)
What about appendage or adjunct then: Appendage \Ap*pend"age\, n. 1. Something appended to, or accompanying, a principal or greater thing, though not necessary to it, as a portico to a house. [1913 Webster] Adjunct \Ad"junct`\, n. 1. Something joined or added to another thing, but not essentially a part of it. [1913 Webster] andrew -- Aries: (March 21 - April 19) You will come very close to acting heroically when you push an old lady out of the way of a hurtling bus and underneath a cement truck.
msg26773/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature