[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Siracusa) writes: > PAR doesn't compile or precompile to bytecode, it packages, temp-expands, > and runs.
It *could* do this, but loading bytecode in Perl 5 is slower than loading and compiling source, so there's not really much point. What's so magic about bytecode, anyway? > Within the realm of what it does, PAR is pretty amazing. But the internals > are (necessarily) very ugly and fragile. In what way? How have you managed to break it? -- I would have more respect for Ruby if its docs were not in ALL YOUR BASE format. - Dennis Taylor