Michael Homer skribis 2004-09-08 15:54 (+1200): > I think (correct me) what he's getting at here is a sparse array 1=>a, > 3=>b, 4=>c where 2nd is 'b' (the second item) but 1st+1 is undefined > (there is no index 2). I don't know how well that scheme works from a > comprehension point of view though, it seems a little confusing.
Oh my, sparse arrays. Isn't that what we have hashes for? Juerd
