Where are you getting your stuff? Janet Jackson is a member of the Muslim 
Brotherhood?  I can't substantiate any of that stuff.  Are you not aware 
that being a Muslim and being a member of the Brotherhood are not the same 
thing?  The Muslim Brotherhood is not a 'very old and very common 
organization'.  It was founded in the 1920's after the fall of the Ottoman 
Empire so to restore a caliphate like the Ottoman Empire. That is to say, 
the dissolution of all the secular governments and establishment of rule 
over ALL Muslims and their countries by a religious man, preferrably a 
descendant of Mohammed.  And yea, making public laws according to God's law 
- Sharia.  You know, one of those theocracies you liberals claim to oppose 
when it comes to Christians or Jews.  Do you have a clue to what you are 
defending?  


  

On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 10:11:45 AM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote:
>
> So, then you are in agreement that we should designate the entire, 
> sprawling organization of the* Muslim Brotherhood* as a terrorist 
> organization. Do you even know what that means, or the implications - or do 
> you understand how far flung that *organization* is?
>
> Does that mean you will then be Ok with, say, prosecuting Kareem Abdul 
> Jabbar, or Janet Jackson, or Shaquille O'Neill, or Cat Stevens (again) for 
> providing material support to terrorist organizations when they give money 
> to muslim charities that could easily be connected in some way to that very 
> old and very common organization?
>
> One of the things I find most irritating about conservatives is how often 
> they so easily jump to some rash conclusion or snap judgement with little 
> consideration to what will follow.
>
> Did either of you read either of the articles I linked to above?
>  
>
> On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 10:36:44 AM UTC-5, btdt100 wrote:
>>
>> Yes we do!!  Good morning to you too Keith.  
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 9:33:04 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>
>>> Good Morning BDT!
>>>
>>> *"Great Minds~~Think Alike!"*
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:30 AM, btdt100 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh I typed a post before reading all posts. Excuse me but we do see 
>>>> Pitt's argument exactly the same. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 7:57:39 AM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind of like saying:
>>>>>
>>>>>  *"There's chapters of the Ku-Klux-Klan which are benevolent loving 
>>>>> organizations; and we shouldn't label the KKK as a hate group"...*
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Pittalum <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In general, I am of the opinion that it is important that when 
>>>>>> designating the bad guys, to not haphazardly include a whole lotta not 
>>>>>> bad 
>>>>>> guys. I think it's a very bad idea to do so...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's not really so hard to understand, is it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Today, only a handful of countries designate the Brotherhood a 
>>>>>> terrorist organization tout court, including Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE, 
>>>>>> Russia, and Syria. Many more countries designate local chapters of the 
>>>>>> Brotherhood terrorist organizations when they engage in terrorism, as 
>>>>>> has 
>>>>>> been the case with Hamas.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would never argue that designating a Brotherhood segment is 
>>>>>> inappropriate. Far from it. If the U.S. government obtains credible 
>>>>>> evidence that the Egyptian Brotherhood organization, for example, is 
>>>>>> ordering its members to engage in terrorism, then it should be 
>>>>>> designated a 
>>>>>> foreign terrorist organization. But that designation should be confined 
>>>>>> to 
>>>>>> the chapter engaging in violence and not extended to the other 
>>>>>> Brotherhood 
>>>>>> entities elsewhere in the world that might have nothing to do with 
>>>>>> terrorism."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.brookings.edu/blog/markaz/2017/01/30/should-the-muslim-brotherhood-be-designated-a-terrorist-organization/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 8:30:57 AM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm baffled by posts like this Pittalum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your belief that the Muslim Brotherhood doesn't support violence is 
>>>>>>> unique to say the least.  The Muslim Brotherhood has many individuals 
>>>>>>> who 
>>>>>>> are labeled terrorists in place; the Muslim Brotherhood has long 
>>>>>>> supported 
>>>>>>> ISIS, and although their methods may differ somewhat from ISIS, the 
>>>>>>> Muslim 
>>>>>>> Brotherhood's goal is one in the same with ISIS, which is to achieve 
>>>>>>> and 
>>>>>>> reach Dar-al-Islam; an Islamic worldwide caliphate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Pittalum <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928 and sought to 
>>>>>>>> instill Islamic values into everyday life. It later evolved into a 
>>>>>>>> popular 
>>>>>>>> social and political organization and became Egypt’s leading 
>>>>>>>> opposition 
>>>>>>>> party. It has since inspired similar movements in countries such as 
>>>>>>>> Indonesia, Turkey, Jordan and Morocco. The Brotherhood disavowed 
>>>>>>>> violence 
>>>>>>>> <http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/03/world/africa/egypt-muslim-brotherhood-explainer/>
>>>>>>>>  long 
>>>>>>>> ago, and noted scholars have emphasized 
>>>>>>>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-l-esposito/the-muslim-brotherhood-te_b_9329246.html>
>>>>>>>>  that 
>>>>>>>> it has fostered democratization and moderation in the Middle East. Two 
>>>>>>>> previous U.S. administrations concluded that it does not engage in 
>>>>>>>> terrorism, as did a recent report 
>>>>>>>> <https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfaff/118/118.pdf>
>>>>>>>>  by 
>>>>>>>> the British government."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yet if the group is designated as a terrorist organization, a 
>>>>>>>> growing $57 million Islamophobia machine 
>>>>>>>> <https://islamophobianetwork.com/>, backed by large funders, 
>>>>>>>> well-organized institutions and junk scientists, will be ready to lead 
>>>>>>>> an 
>>>>>>>> effort to link the Muslim Brotherhood to groups here. This industry 
>>>>>>>> demonizes Islam through fake news, ersatz reports and hateful 
>>>>>>>> rhetoric; 
>>>>>>>> fearmongers and peddles falsehoods about Sharia law; and encourages 
>>>>>>>> lawmakers across the country to criminalize Muslim and Arab 
>>>>>>>> communities 
>>>>>>>> through bans, registries, watch lists and the like. They have helped 
>>>>>>>> introduce 
>>>>>>>> <https://islamophobianetwork.com/consequences#mapping-anti-sharia-legislation>
>>>>>>>>  more 
>>>>>>>> than 100 anti-Sharia bills in state legislatures and encouraged 
>>>>>>>> and trained law enforcement 
>>>>>>>> <https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion/reports/2015/02/11/106394/fear-inc-2-0/>
>>>>>>>>  to 
>>>>>>>> see Islam as a religion of violence."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/02/08/calling-the-muslim-brotherhood-a-terrorist-group-would-hurt-all-american-muslims/?utm_term=.c5a651f30c60
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 2:44:33 AM UTC-5, btdt100 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe you are the one who needs to get out more
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Egypt declares Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group
>>>>>>>>> Announcement criminalises all activities, financing for and 
>>>>>>>>> membership of group from which ousted President Morsi hailed
>>>>>>>>>  This article is *3 years old*
>>>>>>>>> Shares
>>>>>>>>> 595
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Associated Press in Cairo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wednesday 25 December 2013 12.22 EST
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/25/egypt-declares-muslim-brotherhood-terrorist-group
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 8:15:48 PM UTC-6, Pittalum wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You fellows should really try to get out more...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Like issuing a blanket ban on allowing in nationals from seven 
>>>>>>>>>> predominantly Muslim countries, designating the Muslim Brotherhood 
>>>>>>>>>> does 
>>>>>>>>>> nothing to thwart terrorism and imposes unnecessary burdens on large 
>>>>>>>>>> numbers of people mainly to satisfy a clutch of fanatics here at 
>>>>>>>>>> home. 
>>>>>>>>>> Worse, wrongly designating nonviolent groups as part of a terrorist 
>>>>>>>>>> organization feeds into jihadist propaganda and potentially 
>>>>>>>>>> encourages 
>>>>>>>>>> political violence. The administration’s main “counter-terrorism” 
>>>>>>>>>> initiatives so far have nothing to do with countering terrorism and 
>>>>>>>>>> everything to do with indulging excessive fear of people that do not 
>>>>>>>>>> pose a 
>>>>>>>>>> threat to the U.S."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/the-cost-of-designating-the-muslim-brotherhood-as-terrorists/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 6:41:25 PM UTC-5, btdt100 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If they elect him, there won't be a democratic party in the 
>>>>>>>>>>> forever.  I hope they do elect him.  
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 5:03:07 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [[  If they elect him they will forever be known as the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Democrap-Muzzieshit-Traitor Party.  ]]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>>>> For options & help see 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>>>> --- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>>  
>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ 
>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to