if the hamas leaders are committing war crimes put them on trial right
alone with the Jews who have been committing war crimes !

On Jan 17, 10:51 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> Then go after HAMAS leaders who MADE the Gazan civilian not covered
> under the Geneva Accords -  by placing their military units in
> civilian areas...   But the deeper argument here is "Is Hamas a group
> of "Freedom Fighters seeking to overthrow Israeli oppression and thus
> allowed to hide their fighters among otherwise covered civilians or at
> they a proto-state required to operate under the Geneva Accords?"
>
> You wish to claim the former, I claim the latter...   It is precisely
> this reason which in part was the motivation of the UN's inability to
> distinguish between Freedom Fighter and Terrorist...  To do so robs
> many groups the protection civilians when shooting at their
> opponents...   This is also why so many cling to the now untrue claims
> of Western Imperialism and Colonial to justify local elites practicing
> thuggery and human rights abuses in the name of "Anti-
> Imperialism".....
>
> On Jan 17, 9:54 am, "liberal mike532  !" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > i don't care what you think the people who live in Gaza have done to
> > deserve being victims of war crimes . they are still war crimes !
>
> > On Jan 17, 9:39 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > By simple logic. Obscurants are allowed in all areas frequented or
> > > occupied by combatants.
>
> > > ALL areas frequented or occupied by combatants are open to attack.
>
> > > Hamas is attempting (actually it's gone beyond that) to use their own
> > > wives and kids (and those of everyone else) as shields in order raise
> > > the ire of people in the world against their "enemies" who refuse to
> > > be disuaded by the age old "chicken-shit" tactic.  I say
> > > "chicken-shit" because it would not work without the cooperation of
> > > the populace in general as well. It is all about getting YOU to take
> > > their side for ANY reason by ANY means. In this case the passive and
> > > unforced human shield.
>
> > > It would seem to be working in your case. It seems you are pissed at
> > > the Israelis for targeting combatants that use their own populace as
> > > fodder.
>
> > > I am NOT in favor of the tactics of either side in this long and
> > > unending conflict but I am sure of a couple of things........ It is
> > > next to impossible to prove the negative (your points). Using and
> > > allowing themselves to be used as human shields is wrong (or are they
> > > ALL Hamas?).
>
> > > AND what Hamas tries to but can not forget, AND what is the craw in
> > > the throats of
> > > ALL the OTHER M.E. Moslem nations that won't allow Palestinians
> > > entrance regardless of why.... NO ONE has ever allowed the
> > > Palestinians as much freedom nor as many (basic reason for
> > > continuously stirring the pot) personal or public rights as Israel
> > > when they are not mis-behaving. A few of these rights are deeded land
> > > ownership, purely autonomous zones, work in Israel with all tax
> > > with-holdings sent to the Palestinian government, free health care in
> > > Israel (ever wonder why those Palestinian hospitals were not so hot to
> > > begin with?)
>
> > > Palestinian civilians, with the cooperation of Israel, have a much
> > > higher standard of living than any of their neighbors and this does
> > > not suit or please the powers that be in the fanatic Moslem world.
>
> > > On 1/17/09, liberal mike532  ! <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > can you dispute an of the points i have made with facts?
>
> > > > On Jan 16, 3:49 pm, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > That is just NOT true, It is very unlike you.
>
> > > > > That's kinda funny, actually. I think this is very much like Mike, who
> > > > > will exaggerate, embellish or fabricate whatever is required to make
> > > > > his point.
>
> > > > > On Jan 16, 1:45 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > That is just NOT true, It is very unlike you.
>
> > > > > > The phosphorous is allowed as an obscurant. There has been no proof 
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > TARGETING civilians. If the UN (my ex boss) does not want its camps
> > > > > > hit then they need to keep them free of combatants (it is one of 
> > > > > > their
> > > > > > responsibilities).
>
> > > > > > It is completely legal to target combatants regardless of where they
> > > > > > set up camp. This includes day care centers and schools and 
> > > > > > hospitals
> > > > > > and nursing homes.
>
> > > > > > On 1/16/09, liberal mike532  ! <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > the Jews have been using white phoperous on civilians which is a 
> > > > > > > war
> > > > > > > crime and have been targeting civilians not to mention a UN refuge
> > > > > > > camp .
>
> > > > > > > On Jan 16, 11:36 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> 
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > No, Mike, they are not. They have not used a single banned 
> > > > > > > > weapon or
> > > > > > > > tactic.
>
> > > > > > > > They have not targeted a single location that did not have
> > > > > > > > combatants.
>
> > > > > > > > There is no proof to the contrary. This can NOT be said for 
> > > > > > > > Hamas or
> > > > > > > > the Gazan people.
>
> > > > > > > > The fact that women and children are in the locations where the
> > > > > > > > Palestinian combatants set up shop speaks to the value they 
> > > > > > > > place on
> > > > > > > > their own people. It also shows the non-combatants basic 
> > > > > > > > intelligence
> > > > > > > > for staying with their women and children (or actually bringing 
> > > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > to a site) when offensive or defensive posts are placed in their
> > > > > > > > midst.
>
> > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 9:54 am, "liberal mike532  !" 
> > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > why would i care what hamas's Ideology is  ?
> > > > > > > > >  it is the Jew's who are committing war crimes !
>
> > > > > > > > > On Jan 16, 9:59 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > The Ideological Era that anyone who oppose Western 
> > > > > > > > > > Imperialism had to
> > > > > > > > > > be better is over...  Even your Italian brethren sees the 
> > > > > > > > > > error of
> > > > > > > > > > this logic now...  I will suggest that the Left in this 
> > > > > > > > > > Country ALSO
> > > > > > > > > > crossed the line in uncivil and hateful speech over and 
> > > > > > > > > > over the last
> > > > > > > > > > 8 years...   In the end, their Ideology and Urban Myth 
> > > > > > > > > > history will
> > > > > > > > > > also be rejected...
>
> > > > > > > > > >http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/01/italian-parliamentarians-ra...
>
> > > > > > > > > > >>> This is an episode of the attack agains the western 
> > > > > > > > > > >>> world, and Iran has a lot to do with it.
>
> > > > > > > > > > The change of attitude is great: the dictatorial religious 
> > > > > > > > > > nature of
> > > > > > > > > > Hamas and the democratic, civilized nature of Israel are 
> > > > > > > > > > seen face to
> > > > > > > > > > face for what they are at least by the European elite at 
> > > > > > > > > > large, dead
> > > > > > > > > > and wounded notwithstanding, and there rises an 
> > > > > > > > > > identification with
> > > > > > > > > > Israel against a regime that uses human shields and promises
> > > > > > > > > > slaughters of Jews in its charter.
>
> > > > > > > > > > What happens today, at least in Italy, is the defeat and 
> > > > > > > > > > fall of the
> > > > > > > > > > leftist ideologies: ideology has been the fig leaf that has 
> > > > > > > > > > allowed to
> > > > > > > > > > justify all the most violent crimes and most disgusting 
> > > > > > > > > > verbal
> > > > > > > > > > attacks. If Arafat launched the terrorist Intifada, if he 
> > > > > > > > > > promoted the
> > > > > > > > > > martyrdom of children in public speeches, the ideologists 
> > > > > > > > > > were ready
> > > > > > > > > > to justify him with the issues of occupation, the 
> > > > > > > > > > Palestinian misery
> > > > > > > > > > and loss of any hope. Not the same with Hamas. History, in 
> > > > > > > > > > Italy, has
> > > > > > > > > > brought to a profound crisis the ideology of revolution and 
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > justification of any cruel attack against a pretended unjust
> > > > > > > > > > imperialist order. That time is in good part over, nobody 
> > > > > > > > > > will see
> > > > > > > > > > Hamas as the resolution of the problem and not as the 
> > > > > > > > > > problem itself.
> > > > > > > > > > I also think that the word "peace" has lost that healing 
> > > > > > > > > > meaning that
> > > > > > > > > > it had until yesterday. The new non-ideological point of 
> > > > > > > > > > view sees
> > > > > > > > > > that there is no peace when one of the contenders doesn't 
> > > > > > > > > > want it, and
> > > > > > > > > > that even if the world in the short run asks for a truce, 
> > > > > > > > > > in the long
> > > > > > > > > > run requests a defeat of Hamas.
>
> > > > > > > > > > Well, yesterday night many people, Ministers and Members of
> > > > > > > > > > Parliament, composed a very new, interesting puzzle of 
> > > > > > > > > > opinions. I
> > > > > > > > > > think that when you are not overwhelmed by exotic 
> > > > > > > > > > thirdworldism, the
> > > > > > > > > > images of children educated as hate machines, the speeches 
> > > > > > > > > > of jihad
> > > > > > > > > > leaders, from Ahmadinejad to Nasrallah, to Hanje, that deny 
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > holocaust and promise death to Jewish and Christians too, 
> > > > > > > > > > have on us a
> > > > > > > > > > result of great disgust. Westerners, thanks God, can still 
> > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > disgusted by an uncivilized level of political speech.- 
> > > > > > > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Mark M. Kahle
> > > > > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... 
> > > > > > Me- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > --
> > > Mark M. Kahle
> > > Blessed are the bewildered for they don't know the difference.... Me- 
> > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to