now that i can agree with !

On Jan 18, 5:40 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think the leaders, political and religious from both sides, should
> be taken out and shot. We might then be able to start a real dilogue
> in the ME.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:26 PM, frankg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Mark,
>
> > It's not that he is emotionally vested in his position on this that
> > bothers me but rather his failure to consider and evaluating what the
> > opposing side has said - in this case you and jgg - and respond
> > accordingly. And he does this time and time again. It's obvious you
> > feel pretty strongly about this as well but that has not prevented you
> > from presenting facts and making logical arguments.
>
> > On Jan 18, 1:51 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I disagree with both you and frank. He is just allowing his deep felt
> >> emotions on the matter to get the best of him in this matter..
>
> >> On 1/18/09, Cold Water <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > Mike will waste your valuable time (his goal) and continue to spew the 
> >> > same
> >> > garbage.  Wise up!
>
> >> > CW
> >> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> > From: "frankg" <[email protected]>
> >> > To: "PoliticalForum" <[email protected]>
> >> > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 12:05
> >> > Subject: Re: A note to Mike, Even Europe is tiring over Hamas' hateful 
> >> > and
> >> > bloody Ideology
>
> >> > Mark, I tried to warn you. Do not attempt to reason with Mike using
> >> > facts and logic, it won't work. He'll just keep repeating the same
> >> > thing over and over like a busted record. Don't expect him to try to
> >> > address the points you made; to do so would require him to either
> >> > counter with facts and logic of his own or admit he was wrong, neither
> >> > of which I think I have ever seen Mike do on this board.
>
> >> > On Jan 18, 11:39 am, "liberal mike532  !" <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > what the israelites are doing is covered in the Geneva convention
> >> > > under war crimes .
>
> >> > > On Jan 18, 10:24 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > No, Mike. War crimes and that which makes them so is carefully 
> >> > > > defined
> >> > > > in the covenants. Nothing you are proffering meets the requirements.
>
> >> > > > I am not justifying anything. I am saying your logic is flawed and
> >> > > > that it is NOT supported by fact.
>
> >> > > > By using the acts of Hamas I am pointing out things that DO qualify 
> >> > > > as
> >> > > > war crimes. It is, for me, an arguement over legalities.
> >> > > > confrontations like these have no good and bad, just bad and worse.
> >> > > > legal definitions do NOT contain or allow room for emotions. I 
> >> > > > suggest
> >> > > > you check yours at the door and take another look.
>
> >> > > > On 1/18/09, liberal mike532 ! <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > the one small detail as you call it is that they are committing war
> >> > > > > crimes !
> >> > > > > and you are trying to justify the indefensible by saying but the
> >> > > > > Palestinians are bad people too . so fucking what ? they are all 
> >> > > > > bad
> >> > > > > people people and the war crimes are still being committed !
> >> > > > > On Jan 17, 4:14 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > Mike, on this issue you are NO different than Gaar. you are 
> >> > > > > > paying
> >> > > > > > attention to one SMALL but not insignificant part of the story 
> >> > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > considering that which sticks in your craw as the ONLY point of
> >> > > > > > view.
>
> >> > > > > > Phosphorous is legal. Bombing a house where there are combatants 
> >> > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > NOT a crime. Throwing a grenade into your living room is illegal
> >> > > > > > EXCEPT when an overt threat is directed at me.... it does NOT 
> >> > > > > > MATTER
> >> > > > > > who is there with you. There were shots fired from the UN 
> >> > > > > > compound
> >> > > > > > (not the first time, I have seen it in the Congo) The UN (my
> >> > > > > > employers) were NOT allowed in the compound yet were (and are),
> >> > > > > > responsible for those that enter and what is on their persons, 
> >> > > > > > they
> >> > > > > > are trying to deny their responsibilities. To take action against
> >> > > > > > shots from within or from nearby that compound is NOT a crime. To
> >> > > > > > stop
> >> > > > > > a boat from entering Israeli waters when that is its STATED and
> >> > > > > > MANIFESTED purpose is NOT a crime. Israel gave notice to the
> >> > > > > > international community and shipping about hours and places of
> >> > > > > > admission... and have complied with that schedule.... the people 
> >> > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > that boat CHOSE to ignore it, they could have been legally sunk.
>
> >> > > > > > NEXT !!!!!
>
> >> > > > > > By definition these are NOT in any sense of the word, war crimes.
>
> >> > > > > > It is Hamas that is steadfastly refusing the cease fire and
> >> > > > > > demanding
> >> > > > > > unchecked admission to Israel.
>
> >> > > > > > On 1/17/09, liberal mike532 ! <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > mark are you saying the Israelis have not used phosphorus or
> >> > > > > > > bombed
> >> > > > > > > civilian houses ? oh and lets not forget about bombing the UN 
> >> > > > > > > camp
> >> > > > > > > as
> >> > > > > > > well as attacking ships in international waters .
> >> > > > > > > each and every one of these things is a war crime as you well 
> >> > > > > > > know
> >> > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > nothing the palestinians do or did will justify the Jews
> >> > > > > > > committing
> >> > > > > > > war crimes .
> >> > > > > > > On Jan 17, 3:14 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > You have yet to point to one FACT confirming your 
> >> > > > > > > > position....
> >> > > > > > > > you are
> >> > > > > > > > starting to sound just like Gaar.
>
> >> > > > > > > > On 1/17/09, liberal mike532 ! <[email protected]> 
> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > Do you think Hamas did NOT realize that offensive action 
> >> > > > > > > > > would
> >> > > > > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > > > > > taken when the Israelis were fired on ??
> >> > > > > > > > > that has nothing to do with the fact that the Jews are
> >> > > > > > > > > committing war
> >> > > > > > > > > crimes ! nothing can justifie commiting war crimes nothing 
> >> > > > > > > > > !
> >> > > > > > > > > On Jan 17, 12:35 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > It seems that you overlooked this one small point.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > Do you think Hamas did NOT realize that offensive action
> >> > > > > > > > > > would be
> >> > > > > > > > > > taken when the Israelis were fired on ?? They knew. They 
> >> > > > > > > > > > did
> >> > > > > > > > > > not care.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > Mike, if you shoot at me from your family room and it is
> >> > > > > > > > > > full of
> >> > > > > > > > > > peole... I'm shooting back. Where the confrontation takes
> >> > > > > > > > > > place is
> >> > > > > > > > > > your choice and the results (based on location) on your
> >> > > > > > > > > > head.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > Israeli PM Olmert said Hamas militants had fired at 
> >> > > > > > > > > > Israeli
> >> > > > > > > > > > troops
> >> > > > > > > > > > from the location.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the military 
> >> > > > > > > > > > fired
> >> > > > > > > > > > artillery
> >> > > > > > > > > > shells at the U.N. compound after Hamas militants opened
> >> > > > > > > > > > fire from the
> >> > > > > > > > > > location. Three people were wounded.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:18 AM, liberal mike532 !
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Israeli Forces Shell UN Headquarters in Gaza
> >> > > > > > > > > > >http://www.truthout.org/011509C
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Ibrahim Barzak and Amy Teibel, The Associated Press:
> >> > > > > > > > > > > "Israeli forces
> >> > > > > > > > > > > shelled the United Nations headquarters in the Gaza 
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Strip
> >> > > > > > > > > > > on
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Thursday,
> >> > > > > > > > > > > setting fire to the compound filled with hundreds of
> >> > > > > > > > > > > refugees as U.N.
> >> > > > > > > > > > > chief Ban Ki-moon was in the region on a mission to end
> >> > > > > > > > > > > Israel's
> >> > > > > > > > > > > devastating offensive against the territory's Hamas
> >> > > > > > > > > > > rulers."
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 17, 10:15 am, Mark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> What proof do you have of that Mike??
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> The crime being committed is the use of 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> non-combatants as
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> fodder.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> There is no proof Israel has used a single illegal
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> weapon, targeted a
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> single spot without proof a combatant was there, or
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> prosecuted the war
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> with unnecessary force.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Yet Hamas demands unfettered access to Israel as one 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> of
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> their demands.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> Hell, it takes a passport to enter canada and mexico
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> now.... no one
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> gets unfettered access to anyone elses country. Talk
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> about unreal and
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> knowing it !!
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> On 1/17/09, liberal mike532 ! 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> <[email protected]>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > not one word of that has anything to do the Jews
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > committing war
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > crimes !
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > On Jan 17, 9:46 am, Mark <[email protected]> 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Margareth,
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Being nice did not work. The Moslem fanatics can 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > not
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > allow it to work.
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > It is absolutely counter to their goals and hoped 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > for
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > control of every
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > aspect of the lives of every Moslem to allow it 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > to do
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > so.
>
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > Just imagine what would happen to their doctrine 
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > if
> >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > rule of
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to