No, they didn't say that at all. What they said was, if the Senate hasn't ratified the treaty before the old one runs out "we’ll have to look at arrangements to continue some of the inspection".
So this has nothing to do with the President trying to short-cut the Senate to implement a new traety. On 7 Juli, 01:51, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > But he has already said he is going to short-cut the Senate and just > sign and implement the treaty. slight difference there. > > > > pain wrote: > > This is how treaties are made. Just because a leader signs a treaty > > doesn't mean it's been implmented. It's up to the legislative body to > > retify a treaty. I don't really see the problem. How do you suppose > > the Congress approves a treaty before it's been negotiated? > > > On 6 Juli, 18:14, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Sounds right to me. I don't see where the president can just make the > >> treaty without the consent of the US Senate. If I remember right it > >> takes both of them to approve the treaties. It is not really a done > >> deal if the president signs it unless the senate also approves it. > >> Guess they forgot that one. Of course they also tried to forget that > >> when it came to Kyoto for a while as the Dems tried to force the US to > >> implement a treaty that the Senate never ratified. Looks like another > >> one coming along. > > >> *The Constitution Imposes Severe Limits On A President's Treaty-Making > >> Powers: * Here's the relevant section > >> <http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_United_States_of_Am...>: > > >> He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the > >> Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators > >> present concur; > > >> The Obama administration is finding that limitation inconvenient > >> <http://hotair.com/archives/2009/07/05/obama-hey-lets-bypass-the-senat...>, > >> and so they are thinking of "temporarily bypassing" > >> <http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/07/us-russian-arms-negot...> > >> the Senate. Not on any important matter, just a little agreement with > >> the Russians on limiting nuclear arms. > > >> I looked carefully through the Constitution, and could not find any > >> provision that allows a president to bypass, temporarily or otherwise, > >> that limit on his treaty-making powers. > > >> Senator Byrd --- among others --- isn't going to like this one little bit. > >> - 8:08 AM, 6 July 2009 [link] > >> <http://www.seanet.com/%7Ejimxc/Politics/July2009_1.html#jrm7578>- Dölj > >> citerad text - > > - Visa citerad text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
