I made a mistake about who posted that. I thought you did. As far as the tight formation thing didn't require anything more than watching the news. Two forces, main and support. Cavalry and Infantry all together, all taking the same damn roads. One West, then North, the other just straight to Baghdad. Hell, I remember Wolf Blitzer putting maps up! A grand total of two WMDs and we would have been toast. But we knew there were none. I thought you were former military. My mistake on that too. We've known since the 50's that you break up forces and spread them out over the largest land area possible (but always within quick reach of each other), if there is any hint of WMD. Ask anyone with any experience at all in warfare. And btw, I've never insulted you. That's in your character.
On Jul 18, 7:21 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > You can call me Zebbie if you like. Plenty of people do. I'm fine with > it. People with low self esteem often take offense where none is > intended, I guess. > > >Zebnick Wrote: "if Bubba (Clinton) had terminated Osama when the... > >A lot of people might have misunderstood that to be blaming Clinton. > > And if I had written that you'd have a point, which you > don't....again. I won't hold my breath waiting for you to acknowledge > your error. > > On Jul 18, 10:04 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > "Freddie"? lol Okay. If the juvenile bs makes you feel good, well I > > guess that's just you. You DO get to see what people are like here. > > Well, I'm glad you "don't blame Clinton" because this kinda threw me > > off, in that regard: > > Zebnick Wrote: "if Bubba (Clinton) had terminated Osama when the CIA > > had him in their sights in 1998. He ( Osama ) > > would not have been around to plan 9/11, hence the course of history > > would have ( most likely ) been different. Suffice it to say Clinton > > did not act and more or less got caught with his pants down." > > > A lot of people might have misunderstood that to be blaming Clinton. > > Thanks for the correction. > > > On Jul 18, 6:52 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > LOL! Geez Freddie, I'll bet you pissed yourself jumping to Clinton's > > > defense there. > > > > > "OBL plans to use commercial aircraft to attack the US". > > > > What would YOU have done, tough guy. Shut down the commercial airline > > > industry? Close all the airports? You lefties seem to think that was a > > > specific threat. It was not. And it did not exist in a vacuum. > > > Thousands of threat scenarios were being evaluated. > > > > The fact is that all of the 9/11 terrorists came to the US while > > > Clinton was in office and trained here to fly planes. > > > > But I don't blame Clinton for 9/11. I blame Bin Laden. It could easily > > > happen again. > > > > On Jul 18, 8:38 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > LOL! Clinton to blame for 9/11... .ROFL If only he'd had a memo or > > > > something! Say for instance, one that read "OBL plans to use > > > > commercial aircraft to attack the US". > > > > But I know, I know, it was CLINTON's fault! roflmao > > > > > I love it when Liberals or Conservatives blinded by their ideology > > > > write that hysterical kind of bs. Just cracks me up! > > > > > On Jul 18, 4:24 pm, Sage2 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > This whole argument can easily be put to an end ( if were > > > > > looking for blame ) if Bubba had terminated Osama when the CIA had him > > > > > in their sights in 1998. He ( Osama ) > > > > > would not have been around to plan 9/11, hence the course of history > > > > > would have ( most likely ) been different. Suffice it to say Clinton > > > > > did not act and more or less got caught with his pants down. No 9/11; > > > > > no Afghan war & no Iraq war. The next thing I expect on this thread is > > > > > that 9/11 had nothing to do with it. I will also remind you that the > > > > > Iraq war no matter how you disagree with it was not illegal. The > > > > > Congress of the USA and numerous countries signed on. Just as there > > > > > were no WMD ( questionable ) there is no silver bullet against either > > > > > George Bush or the CIA. > > > > > > ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ > > > > > > On Jul 18, 6:37 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Clinton did not commit the US to armed conflict... it was > > > > > > prohibited by a > > > > > > congress that had been told the truth.... > > > > > > > read more » > > > > > > > Further release date is NOT important.... it was signed in Sept. of > > > > > > 2006... > > > > > > no wiggle room there > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:52 PM, dick thompson > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > What I threw out at you was info about the use of gas on the > > > > > > > Kurds (true) > > > > > > > and about the fact that the US did not provide the nuclear > > > > > > > equipment that > > > > > > > Saddam had (true) and that Clinton signed a bill authorizing him > > > > > > > to cause > > > > > > > regime change in Iraq (true). Also note that the chairman of the > > > > > > > committee > > > > > > > was not a Republican, we have no idea of the bipartisan makeup > > > > > > > and vote of > > > > > > > the committee, the report was released in 2008 (the Republicans > > > > > > > were not in > > > > > > > charge then). Also look back on the Senate report on 9/11 and > > > > > > > what a load > > > > > > > of bull that one was! Why should I accept this then. > > > > > > > > Mark wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes it was and you decided to try a history lesson on me and > > > > > > > throw out some > > > > > > > "holier than thou" Gringo bullshit > > > > > > > > again read the ONLY empiracal repoort done on this > > > > > > >http://intelligence.senate.gov/press/record.cfm?id=298775 then > > > > > > >choke mon > > > > > > > your BS > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:31 PM, dick thompson > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > >> The subject was AFghanistan and Iraq > > > > > > > >> Mark wrote: > > > > > > > >> how about the thirty oir so thousand that died in central > > > > > > >> america in the > > > > > > >> same time period at thands of alzheimer ronnie. ?? US forces > > > > > > >> lead by Felix > > > > > > >> Rodriguez (I know, I met him there) > > > > > > > >> please read the republican dominated "senate intelligence > > > > > > >> report" from > > > > > > >> sept 2006 that says ALL the info you are trying to feed me now > > > > > > >> is pure > > > > > > >> BULLSHIT.... > > > > > > > >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Zebnick <[email protected]> > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> >Thedifference in time from having used and being falsely > > > > > > >>> >accused of > > > > > > >>> having gas was 25 years..... > > > > > > > >>> Really?LOL! Did the thousands who died wretching deaths come > > > > > > >>> back to > > > > > > >>> life in those 25 years? Did Saddam act like he'd become a > > > > > > >>> humanitarian > > > > > > >>> in those 25 years? Oh WAIT! Thats right! Saddam insisted that > > > > > > >>> he still > > > > > > >>> HAD WMDs. Only when the UN sanctioned him did he say they were > > > > > > >>> gone.....supplying no evidence of their disposal, of course. > > > > > > > >>> >as far as building that reactor in Iraq... the US supplied and > > > > > > >>> >built > > > > > > >>> it AND donated the yellow cake as well..... > > > > > > > >>> ROTFLMAO. You are either a very bad liar or a complete idiot. I > > > > > > >>> think > > > > > > >>> both. Bye! > > > > > > > >>> On Jul 18, 3:26 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > I didn't think he ahd gas or wmd's or nukes (though I Knew he > > > > > > >>> > was > > > > > > >>> > sitting on a research reactor and a mountain of yellow cake) > > > > > > >>> > The > > > > > > >>> > difference in time from having used and being falsely accused > > > > > > >>> > of > > > > > > >>> > having gas was 25 years..... > > > > > > > >>> > as far as building that reactor in Iraq... the US supplied > > > > > > >>> > and built > > > > > > >>> > it AND donated the yellow cake as well..... You are right the > > > > > > >>> > US is a > > > > > > >>> > danger even to itself. The only deluded person/people seems > > > > > > >>> > to be you > > > > > > >>> > and Gringolandia. > > > > > > > >>> > On Jul 18, 12:07 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > >If there had been WMD, we wouldn't have gone in the way we > > > > > > >>> > > >did. > > > > > > > >>> > > We thought he had poison gas. Our soldiers were equipped to > > > > > > >>> > > confront > > > > > > >>> > > it. > > > > > > > >>> > > Everybody thought he had WMDs, mostly because he not only > > > > > > >>> > > HAD them > > > > > > >>> but > > > > > > >>> > > because he used them against his enemies. > > > > > > > >>> > > Oh and btw, Iraq is not now and never was a nuclear nation > > > > > > >>> > > state > > > > > > > >>> > > Actually, they were. Iraq had completed construction of a > > > > > > >>> > > nuclear > > > > > > >>> > > reactor (That makes you a nuclear nation state) but Israel > > > > > > >>> immediately > > > > > > >>> > > blew it up. (Thank you Israel). > > > > > > > >>> > > Some people would say that a leader who builds a nuclear > > > > > > >>> > > reactor > > > > > > >>> > > despite worldwide protests and has and uses poison gas on > > > > > > >>> > > neighboring > > > > > > >>> > > countries and his own people was a dangerous guy. Other > > > > > > >>> > > people like > > > > > > >>> > > deluding themselves. > > > > > > > >>> > > On Jul 18, 1:42 pm, Frederick The Moderate > > > > > > > >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > If there had been WMD, we wouldn't have gone in the way > > > > > > >>> > > > we did. > > > > > > >>> Large, > > > > > > >>> > > > tight formations are easy targets and we know that. Not > > > > > > >>> > > > to mention > > > > > > >>> > > > that we would have sent a least one division to sweep and > > > > > > >>> > > > search > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > >>> > > > area where we "knew" the WMD's were for residual (or any > > > > > > >>> > > > other) > > > > > > >>> > > > evidence they ever existed. We never did. Not one peek. > > > > > > >>> > > > I'm former > > > > > > >>> > > > navy intel and i can assure you, even though Bush screwed > > > > > > >>> > > > our > > > > > > >>> Humint > > > > > > >>> > > > network fro some time to come, we still would have been > > > > > > >>> > > > able to > > > > > > >>> find > > > > > > >>> > > > evidence - if believed it was ever there. > > > > > > >>> > > > But I get it. You really, really, really want to believe > > > > > > >>> > > > there were > > > > > > >>> > > > WMD's there. Okay. > > > > > > > >>> > > > Oh and btw, Iraq is not now and never was a nuclear > > > > > > >>> > > > nation state > > > > > > >>> but > > > > > > >>> > > > again, if you really want to believe it is or was, okay > > > > > > >>> > > > dokey. > > > > > > > >>> > > > Talk about wanting to believe lies. > > > > > > > >>> > > > I've lost five friends in Iraq. All of them Psy-Ops and a > > > > > > >>> > > > couple > > > > > > >>> Force > > > > > > >>> > > > Recon. They've made it clear for years that Iraq will > > > > > > >>> > > > never > > > > > > >>> appreciate > > > > > > >>> > > > what we've done and no matter how long we're there, > > > > > > >>> > > > they'll regress > > > > > > >>> > > > shortly after we leave. Two thousand years of culture. > > > > > > >>> > > > Iraq has already made clear they view US as > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
