Whoopsie, did I just hit my send button? I guess I was laughing so hard at Truth Sojouner's last missives, my apologies!
I mean, when we think of TommyTomTomForNews, and his attempt at revising history, poor Tommy doesn't hold a candle to TruthSojourner, who obviously can give classes on anti-American revisionist Moonbattery, especially to the uninformed! Once again, a post from August, 2008, and the old adage, "Everything Changes.....Nothing Changes...." On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:53 PM, KeithInTampa wrote: Keith Responds: ....Well, how's that for some kinder, gentler arrogance? And by the same token, there are those in Western Civilization that are truly baffled by the naivety of those who cannot see the threat posed by Islam, to our very way of life, and who would in fact make statements like what you just made. What gets me, is the "Kinder, Gentler, Tree Hugging" faction's logic, and then, their hateful repartee when confronted with the truth. Any time a conversation starts out with, "Bush Lied", or "Gore won the election", you know the conversation is never going to be based on fact, or logic, or anything remotely resembling a rational discourse. The conversations usually go something like this: Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "Bush lied". Real American Patriot: "Lied about what?" Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "The war in Iraq" Real American Patriot: "What part of the war in Iraq do you think President Bush or any of his administration lied about?" Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "Weapons of mass destruction". Real American Patriot: "So, you discount his predecessor, President Clinton's, the CIA's, the M-5's, the Mossad's, the Saudi's, the Russian's, and the Sudanese claims, as well as Saddam Hussein's own claims, and the fact that many of Iraq's known weapons of mass destruction are still unaccounted for, when you make a statement that President Bush lied?" Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "Well, he stole the election, and all I know is Bush lied, and you are a fascist pig for not signing the petition calling for impeachment to oust the pig". On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Keith In Köln <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Truth_Sojourner <[email protected]>wrote: > >> There are a few more to add I'm sure, but I think Colin Powell should be >> with them. Afterall, he knew when he walked into the UN with info from only >> 1 source named "screw ball" as informant an used that evidence that he was >> not standing on his principles, but on his perceived "duty" to the military. >> I think he could have at least said get somebody else, and reported what he >> knew. Did he want to save his "military loyalty", his paycheck, or his >> personal character? I guess we will never know, but he did hang on to the >> paycheck for awhile but that was it. Just sayin' is all. >> >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> > > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
