Dear Keith, Truth Sojourner <<<< What do you think this means? I dictate your truth, I am absolutely 100% positive that I know the truth, that I do not continue to try to find truth? You know what? after a little thought about this I wasn't on a Hummer to see the 2 traveling chemical lab trucks, come to think of it neither were you?
Yes, I've been to the Moonbattery site, but for the life of me (since I went back to try to find why I was on that site) I can't remember. I have a mass in my brain and sometimes my short term memory escapes me. Obviously it wasn't too awfully interesting. It sounds as if you know the answer to that. I have an open mind, so I visit other's sites (read and listen, etc.) to try and get incite or maybe even change my mind, but I don't snap to judgement and decide that I believe anything to be 100%. If I do that, then I will lose my capacity to learn anything else on that subject matter. And by the same token, there are those in Western Civilization that are truly baffled by the naivety of those who cannot see the threat posed by Islam, <<< This baffles you? Then you need to back up and start all over again because you have obviously gotten lost by the way side. But it is not Islam it is people who use a religious book to justify slaughter IMHO. Once again, a post from August, 2008, and the old adage, "Everything Changes.....Nothing Changes...." <<< I prefer to say that the only thing you can count on is change! Real American Patriot: "So, you discount his predecessor, President Clinton's, the CIA's, the M-5's, the Mossad's, the Saudi's, the Russian's, and the Sudanese claims, as well as Saddam Hussein's own claims, and the fact that many of Iraq's known weapons of mass destruction are still unaccounted for, when you make a statement that President Bush lied?" <<< Well Good God Almighty they are still searching and haven't found them in a decade? Maybe they will find them when some more of the ice melts. Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "Bush lied". <<< I never said Bush lied, but somebody sent Colin Powell out there to say it. He didn't have the authority to do it! "Efraim Halevy (a Mossad officer since 1961 and its chief between 1998 and 2002) stated in his book: 'Man in the Shadows' that he was not privy to all the intelligence, but had personal contact with senior levels in the US sums it up that 'Given the extreme shortage of reliable information such potentially threatening issues, were the intelligence chiefs duty-bound to present their assessments to the political level regardless of how much hard material they possessed! The intelligence officer can never tell the political master that he is unable to give an estimate of a threat. Come what may, an officer has to give an estimate, even if it is largely a guess." He goes on the say: "What, then, is the role of the political level in matters such as these? First of all it is the political level that must receive the information, digest it, and set the tone for future discussions and dealings with the subjects at hand." And one more thing: When President George W. Walker Bush said to stop Gulf War I at 100 hours, General Schwarzkopf said that if he could have I believe 2 to 3 more hours he could take Baghdad. President Bush said if we take Baghdad we will own it. That was in Bob Woodward's book: "State of Denial" Laughter is the greatest coping mechanism that we have, so I'm glad you had a good laugh. I am now going to intentionally hit the send button, and if you can't find it within yourself to speak to me (a total stranger) with some respect then we just won't! Peace, Dena On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Keith In Köln <[email protected]>wrote: > Whoopsie, did I just hit my send button? I guess I was laughing so hard > at Truth Sojouner's last missives, my apologies! > > I mean, when we think of TommyTomTomForNews, and his attempt at revising > history, poor Tommy doesn't hold a candle to TruthSojourner, who obviously > can give classes on anti-American revisionist Moonbattery, especially > to the uninformed! > > Once again, a post from August, 2008, and the old adage, "Everything > Changes.....Nothing Changes...." > > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:53 PM, KeithInTampa wrote: > > Keith Responds: > > ....Well, how's that for some kinder, gentler arrogance? > > And by the same token, there are those in Western Civilization that are > truly baffled by the naivety of those who cannot see the threat posed by > Islam, to our very way of life, and who would in fact make statements like > what you just made. What gets me, is the "Kinder, Gentler, Tree Hugging" > faction's logic, and then, their hateful repartee when confronted with the > truth. > > Any time a conversation starts out with, "Bush Lied", or "Gore won the > election", you know the conversation is never going to be based on fact, or > logic, or anything remotely resembling a rational discourse. The > conversations usually go something like this: > > Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "Bush lied". > > Real American Patriot: "Lied about what?" > > Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "The war in Iraq" > > Real American Patriot: "What part of the war in Iraq do you think > President Bush or any of his administration lied about?" > > Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "Weapons of mass destruction". > > Real American Patriot: "So, you discount his predecessor, President > Clinton's, the CIA's, the M-5's, the Mossad's, the Saudi's, the Russian's, > and the Sudanese claims, as well as Saddam Hussein's own claims, and the > fact that many of Iraq's known weapons of mass destruction are still > unaccounted for, when you make a statement that President Bush lied?" > > Kinder, Gentler Tree Hugger: "Well, he stole the election, and all I know > is Bush lied, and you are a fascist pig for not signing the petition calling > for impeachment to oust the pig". > > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Keith In Köln <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Truth_Sojourner >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> There are a few more to add I'm sure, but I think Colin Powell should be >>> with them. Afterall, he knew when he walked into the UN with info from only >>> 1 source named "screw ball" as informant an used that evidence that he was >>> not standing on his principles, but on his perceived "duty" to the military. >>> I think he could have at least said get somebody else, and reported what he >>> knew. Did he want to save his "military loyalty", his paycheck, or his >>> personal character? I guess we will never know, but he did hang on to the >>> paycheck for awhile but that was it. Just sayin' is all. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at >>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >> >> > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
