Mostly I am neutral to the point where it steps on my toes when I visit a particular nation. As to Gaza, I went there as an envoy to start low level talks between the Palestinians, Israelis, US, UK and a small host of others. I was 100 meters from the Hamas bomb that killed my three Palestinian contacts. I live in the real world.... you read about my work but NEVER about me. Tell me, just what experience do you have that qualifies you to speak on anything ?? .I can tell from your writing that you are indeed ignorant. For instance, your constitution, to be acceptable, needs to be able to be translated as it would effect changes in legal agreements between nations.... it is not. The language used is substandard and colloquial.
> I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right. > Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed. — John A. > Armistead — Patriot > > On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would > > say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real > > world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for > > anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to > > meet their own idea of what and who people should be. > > > As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What > > has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the > > last ten years ?? > > > On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear Mark: Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch > > > the news and think about what is going on in the world. I simply > > > don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil > > > that's everywhere. Listen to Rush Limbaugh. He has the world > > > situation pegged fairly well. — J. A. A. — > > > > On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Einstein, > > > > > Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I > > > > give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs > > > > there.. do not Bitch if it is true) > > > > > Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even > > > > considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!? > > > > > Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care > > > > about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done > > > > (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a > > > > clear and present danger?? > > > > > On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational > > > > > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google > > > > > World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very > > > > > naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the > > > > > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit > > > > > TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation > > > > > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed? > > > > > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill > > > > > their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have > > > > > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs > > > > > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused > > > > > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who > > > > > ever lived, including Hitler. > > > > > > Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and > > > > > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested, > > > > > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for > > > > > giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you, > > > > > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed > > > > > you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so > > > > > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a > > > > > better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some > > > > > couch- > > > > > time, Mark. You need it! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Einstein, > > > > > > > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, > > > > > > or > > > > > > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the > > > > > > standard > > > > > > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It > > > > > > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law. > > > > > > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the > > > > > > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s). > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of > > > > > > > "reasoning" in > > > > > > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why > > > > > > > Jews > > > > > > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such > > > > > > > nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful > > > > > > > capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds > > > > > > > Muslims > > > > > > > feel. > > > > > > > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the > > > > > > > USA > > > > > > > is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) > > > > > > > saying > > > > > > > that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in > > > > > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New > > > > > > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm > > > > > > > saying, > > > > > > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New > > > > > > > Constitution has > > > > > > > now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The > > > > > > > last > > > > > > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads > > > > > > > with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the > > > > > > > 85% > > > > > > > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available. > > > > > > > But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as > > > > > > > part of > > > > > > > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed > > > > > > > things > > > > > > > along by talking-up my document on the NET. — John A. Armistead — > > > > > > > Patriot > > > > > > > > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey John! > > > > > > > > > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, > > > > > > > > Mark and MJ are > > > > > > > > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and > > > > > > > > one of them > > > > > > > > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack > > > > > > > > Literal Truth might > > > > > > > > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next > > > > > > > > missive! > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay > > > > > > > > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our > > > > > > > > > political-governmental > > > > > > > > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic > > > > > > > > > resources, > > > > > > > > > or otherwise stupid. — John A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and > > > > > > > > > > fix-up. The > > > > > > > > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty > > > > > > > > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more > > > > > > > > > > fortunes > > > > > > > > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. > > > > > > > > > > By adapting > > > > > > > > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be > > > > > > > > > > assured! — John > > > > > > > > > > A. Armistead — Patriot > > > > > > > > > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest > > > > > > > > > > Distance; > > > > > > > > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.). I'm > > > > > > > > > > thrilled that > > > > > > > > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a > > > > > > > > > > cure for > > > > > > > > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book > > > > > > > > > > explains > > > > > > > > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple > > > > > > > > > > things can > > > > > > > > > > turn this country around! And none of them involving > > > > > > > > > > conducting... > > > > > > > > > > business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know > > > > > > > > > > what I am > > > > > > > > > > doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless! > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an > > > > > > > > > > > open mind, > > > > > > > > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin > > > > > > > > > > > didn't give a > > > > > > > > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed > > > > > > > > > > > them by the > > > > > > > > > > > millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will > > > > > > > > > > > harm ordinary > > > > > > > > > > > citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! — > > > > > > > > > > > J. A. A. > > > > > > > > > > > — > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley < > > > > > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have > > > > > > > > > > > > > an opinion that > > > > > > > > > differs > > > > > > > > > > > > > from yours. How fascist of you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in > > > > > > > > > > > > > entertainment simply > > > > > > > > > > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences > > > > > > > > > > > > > in any MEDIUM. > > ... > > read more » -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
