Too much Democracy IS socialism/communism. On Apr 22, 9:27 am, NoEinstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't > survive without some the public order that is provided by well thought- > out and agreed-to laws. > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things. > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen, > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A. > Armistead — Patriot > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Onestone, > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the "experimental" stage. > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares. Just why > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ?? The laws > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs. > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. — > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > John, > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more than > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make much > > > > of a difference in their daily lives." > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra- > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone, > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages' > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead � > > > Patriot > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> John, > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer > > > > >> questions posed to you.) > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning > > > > >>> government. > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. � > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution. > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist > > > > >>>>> system > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government > > > should > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even > > > ask > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% > > > are > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead > > > � > > > > >>>>> Patriot > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>> John, > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades > > > > >>>>>> websites > > > based > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of > > > expression means. > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm > > > to the > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull > > > off this > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task? > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. > > > Google > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are > > > very > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from > > > the > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on > > > moderation > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be > > > killed? > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who > > > kill > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of > > > > >>>>>>> jobs > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has > > > caused > > > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person > > > who > > > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler. > > > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our > > > > >>>>>>> government > > > and > > > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard > > > arrested, > > > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution > > > for > > > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you, > > > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's > > > viewed > > > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you > > > are so > > > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having > > > > >>>>>>> a > > > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some > > > couch- > > > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> Einstein, > > > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the > > > present, or > > > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the > > > standard > > > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. > > > > >>>>>>>> It > > > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US > > > law. > > > > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the > > > > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their > > > > >>>>>>>> law(s). > > > > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of > > > "reasoning" in > > > > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining > > > > >>>>>>>>> why > > > Jews > > > > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be > > > such > > > > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for > > > successful > > > > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds > > > Muslims > > > > >>>>>>>>> feel. > > > > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that > > > the USA > > > > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) > > > saying > > > > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in > > > > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my > > > New > > > > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. > > > If you > > > > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm > > > saying, > > > > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New > > > Constitution has > > > > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. > > > The last > > > > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted > > > heads > > > > >>>>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for > > > the 85% > > > > >>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become > > > available. > > > > >>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as > > > part of > > > > >>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why > > > this > > > > >>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed > > > things > > > > >>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. > > > Armistead � > > > > >>>>>>>>> Patriot > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Hey John! > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, > > > Mark and MJ are > > > > >>>>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and > > > one of them > > > > >>>>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack > > > Literal Truth might > > > > >>>>>>>>>> even have > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
