J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be in civil war... — J. A. A. — > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without > government. Belgium has been without a national government for more than > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make much > of a difference in their daily lives." > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra- > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone, > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages' > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead � Patriot > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> John, > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer > >> questions posed to you.) > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government. > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on > >>> your own. � J. A. A. � > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution. > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government should > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead � > >>>>> Patriot > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> John, > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites > >>>>>> based > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression > >>>>>> means. > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off > >>>>>> this > >>>>>> tremendous task? > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed? > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler. > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested, > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you, > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some > >>>>>>> couch- > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Einstein, > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, > >>>>>>>> or > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the > >>>>>>>> standard > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law. > >>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the > >>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s). > >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" > >>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews > >>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such > >>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful > >>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds > >>>>>>>>> Muslims > >>>>>>>>> feel. > >>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the > >>>>>>>>> USA > >>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying > >>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in > >>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New > >>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If > >>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying, > >>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution > >>>>>>>>> has > >>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The > >>>>>>>>> last > >>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads > >>>>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the > >>>>>>>>> 85% > >>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available. > >>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part > >>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this > >>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed > >>>>>>>>> things > >>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead > >>>>>>>>> � > >>>>>>>>> Patriot > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Hey John! > >>>>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark > >>>>>>>>>> and MJ are > >>>>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one > >>>>>>>>>> of them > >>>>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal > >>>>>>>>>> Truth might > >>>>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive! > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, > >>>>>>>>>> NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay > >>>>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental > >>>>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic > >>>>>>>>>>> resources, > >>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. > >>>>>>>>>>>> The > >>>>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty > >>>>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more > >>>>>>>>>>>> fortunes > >>>>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By > >>>>>>>>>>>> adapting > >>>>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! > >>>>>>>>>>>> � John > >>>>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest > >>>>>>>>>>>> Distance; > >>>>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm > >>>>>>>>>>>> thrilled that > >>>>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure > >>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book > >>>>>>>>>>>> explains > >>>>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple > >>>>>>>>>>>> things can > >>>>>>>>>>>> turn this country around! And none of them involving > >>>>>>>>>>>> conducting... > >>>>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what > >>>>>>>>>>>> I am > >>>>>>>>>>>> doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless! > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mind, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't > >>>>>>>>>>>>> give a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ordinary > >>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! � J. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> A. A. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> � > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley< > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> John, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion that > >>>>>>>>>>> differs > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from yours. How fascist of you! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MEDIUM. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
