1) Who decides if a "public official" has "tagged" another individual
"as being left or right"?
2) If you could come up with some convoluted scheme for determining such
violations, how do you propose to enforce this?
On 04/20/2011 08:33 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
Jonathan: My New Constitution makes it a crime for any public
official to "tag" anyone as being left or right. The USA will survive
ONLY if all group-against-group fighting stops! Capitalism will
benefit all the people, not just the had-been conservatives. Less
expensive government leaves more money in people's pockets. And that
will encourage more charity close to home. — J. A. A. —
On Apr 20, 12:43 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]>
wrote:
Rush Limbaugh is at best a neo-conservative who spouts off when "the
left" does something insane but keeps his mouth shut when "the right"
does the same insane thing. He does nothing more than perpetuate a
left-right war of the mindless for profit.
Anyone who blindly sides with "the left" or "the right" is someone who
does not think for themselves.
On 04/20/2011 01:49 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Mark: Your being in Gaza... does that mean you are Jewish? Rush
Limbaugh is the number one conservative radio talk-show host in
America. He isn't screwing-up anything, because he doesn't have the
balls to actually lead the revolution that's needed to take back this
country from the socialist-communists. If you aren't an American,
then I can't see why you care about what I do to save this country.
Your oblique protections of Barack Obama show you to be pro left. If
I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right.
Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed. � John A.
Armistead � Patriot
On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would
say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real
world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for
anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to
meet their own idea of what and who people should be.
As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What
has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the
last ten years ??
On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Mark: Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch
the news and think about what is going on in the world. I simply
don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil
that's everywhere. Listen to Rush Limbaugh. He has the world
situation pegged fairly well. � J. A. A. �
On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
Einstein,
Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
(actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
clear and present danger??
On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
ever lived, including Hitler.
Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
Einstein,
Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
feel.
Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead �
Patriot
On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<[email protected]> wrote:
Hey John!
I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote:
Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
(happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! � John
A. Armistead � Patriot
Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm thrilled that
the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! � J. A. A.
�
On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<[email protected]> wrote:
I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
[email protected]> wrote:
John,
So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
differs
from yours. How fascist of you!
On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
great
Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the
...
read more »
--
Freedom Is Always Illegal.
Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft
<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
