Jonathan: My New Constitution makes it a crime for any public official to "tag" anyone as being left or right. The USA will survive ONLY if all group-against-group fighting stops! Capitalism will benefit all the people, not just the had-been conservatives. Less expensive government leaves more money in people's pockets. And that will encourage more charity close to home. — J. A. A. — > On Apr 20, 12:43 pm, Jonathan Ashley <[email protected]> wrote: > Rush Limbaugh is at best a neo-conservative who spouts off when "the > left" does something insane but keeps his mouth shut when "the right" > does the same insane thing. He does nothing more than perpetuate a > left-right war of the mindless for profit. > > Anyone who blindly sides with "the left" or "the right" is someone who > does not think for themselves. > > On 04/20/2011 01:49 AM, NoEinstein wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Mark: Your being in Gaza... does that mean you are Jewish? Rush > > Limbaugh is the number one conservative radio talk-show host in > > America. He isn't screwing-up anything, because he doesn't have the > > balls to actually lead the revolution that's needed to take back this > > country from the socialist-communists. If you aren't an American, > > then I can't see why you care about what I do to save this country. > > Your oblique protections of Barack Obama show you to be pro left. If > > I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right. > > Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed. � John A. > > Armistead � Patriot > > On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >> Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would > >> say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real > >> world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for > >> anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to > >> meet their own idea of what and who people should be. > > >> As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What > >> has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the > >> last ten years ?? > > >> On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Dear Mark: Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch > >>> the news and think about what is going on in the world. I simply > >>> don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil > >>> that's everywhere. Listen to Rush Limbaugh. He has the world > >>> situation pegged fairly well. � J. A. A. � > >>> On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Einstein, > >>>> Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I > >>>> give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs > >>>> there.. do not Bitch if it is true) > >>>> Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even > >>>> considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!? > >>>> Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care > >>>> about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done > >>>> (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a > >>>> clear and present danger?? > >>>> On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational > >>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google > >>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very > >>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the > >>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit > >>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation > >>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed? > >>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill > >>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have > >>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs > >>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused > >>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who > >>>>> ever lived, including Hitler. > >>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and > >>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested, > >>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for > >>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you, > >>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed > >>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so > >>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a > >>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch- > >>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> Einstein, > >>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or > >>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard > >>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It > >>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law. > >>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the > >>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s). > >>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in > >>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews > >>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such > >>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful > >>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims > >>>>>>> feel. > >>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA > >>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying > >>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in > >>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New > >>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you > >>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying, > >>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has > >>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last > >>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads > >>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85% > >>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available. > >>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of > >>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this > >>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things > >>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead � > >>>>>>> Patriot > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hey John! > >>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark > >>>>>>>> and MJ are > >>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of > >>>>>>>> them > >>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal > >>>>>>>> Truth might > >>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive! > >>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, > >>>>>>>> NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay > >>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental > >>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic > >>>>>>>>> resources, > >>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. > >>>>>>>>>> The > >>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty > >>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more > >>>>>>>>>> fortunes > >>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By > >>>>>>>>>> adapting > >>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! � > >>>>>>>>>> John > >>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead � Patriot > >>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest > >>>>>>>>>> Distance; > >>>>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm thrilled > >>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure > >>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains > >>>>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things > >>>>>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>> turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting... > >>>>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I > >>>>>>>>>> am > >>>>>>>>>> doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless! > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open > >>>>>>>>>>> mind, > >>>>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't > >>>>>>>>>>> give a > >>>>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the > >>>>>>>>>>> millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm > >>>>>>>>>>> ordinary > >>>>>>>>>>> citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! � J. A. > >>>>>>>>>>> A. > >>>>>>>>>>> � > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque. > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley< > >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> John, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>> differs > >>>>>>>>>>>>> from yours. How fascist of you! > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment > >>>>>>>>>>>>> simply > >>>>>>>>>>>>> can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any > >>>>>>>>>>>>> MEDIUM. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how > >>>>>>>>> great > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Obama. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the > > ... > > read more »
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
