INLINE:
On 04/20/2011 08:25 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
Jonathan: You should move to Alaska and build yourself a log cabin in
the wilderness.
How do you know that I don't live in a log cabin in Alaska?
Since you would be living by your own hand, you would
have nothing to be taxed, and thus should be happy.
I do not pay income taxes now.
The POWER in my
New Constitution is revealed only by having a problem, then reading my
document and realizing that the solution to that problem is spelled-
out!
YOUR New Constitution does not (and never will have) any "POWER." It
will never be enacted.
Frequently, the answers are found on several non-contiguous
pages. But anyone who can read will see that they are protected.
Can you say: convoluted.
For
example: Though the words "speeding ticket" are never used, I can
guarantee you that no municipality in the country will ever pull over
anyone for a victimless crime. My New Constitution prohibits having
any "fines" go to the government. So, there is no motive for pulling
anyone over, since none of that fine can go to defray the cost of
government.
How do you propose to enforce such a guarantee?
Fines can be used for helping groups like United Way,
however.
That would still fall under the category of "theft" of my property.
If the police pull you over, it is they who will be most in
jeopardy of getting fired or jailed if they aren't deferential to
you. And no person is required to show their “ID” to anyone. The
police can’t, on a whim, stop anyone and ask to see “your papers” like
Nazis did in Germany. They must be respectful of the people, unless
someone is known (beyond reasonable doubt) to have committed some
crime. Then, and only then can the police play their game of cops and
robbers. — J. A. A. —
Again, how do you propose to enforce such a guarantees?
On Apr 20, 12:31 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]>
wrote:
John,
As usual, I find several problem with what you wrote.
1) YOUR New Constitution is so convoluted that those who gained power
under it would be using it for a doormat within months of its passage.
(That point is mute, however, since YOUR New Constitution will NEVER
gain acceptance.)
2) Any form of government that requires me -- through taxation (e.g.,
theft) -- to perpetuate its existence is unacceptable.
3) Civil liberties are privileges that are granted. That is in direct
opposition to freedom. Freedom is "a state of exemption from the power
or control of another." If a government exists, those living under its
dictates (however benevolent they may appear), are never free. Under any
form of government, freedom is always illegal.
4) Government is "social engineering."
On 04/20/2011 01:32 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Jonathan: I read your self description of your being an
anarchist. Is that why you dislike having a New Constitution that
actually tells government what it can and cannot do? The very best
and most efficient government would be a wise, benevolent
dictatorship. But that would end when the dictator died. Government
under my New Constitution is mandated to be run efficiently. And
"social engineering" is banned. You should be on my side, because my
New Constitution will have civil liberties that are the maximum, and
costs that are approaching the minimum. That means all Americans will
get to keep most of their hard-earned money! Would you rather have
Democrats stealing your money? Then, rally behind my save-the-USA
document! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<[email protected]>
wrote:
John,
That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites based
on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression means.
That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off this
tremendous task?
On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
ever lived, including Hitler.
Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<[email protected]> wrote:
Einstein,
Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
feel.
Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead �
Patriot
On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<[email protected]> wrote:
Hey John!
I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<[email protected]>wrote:
Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
(happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! � John
A. Armistead � Patriot
Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm thrilled that
the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<[email protected]> wrote:
Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! � J. A. A.
�
On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<[email protected]> wrote:
I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
[email protected]> wrote:
John,
So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
differs
from yours. How fascist of you!
On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
great
Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
a
candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
their
network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
game
with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the
People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
candidate
say, should rally behind my New Constitution�a document for the
people! � J. A. A. �
...
read more »
--
Freedom Is Always Illegal.
Learn How To Protect Your Identity And Prevent Identity Theft
<http://8f7ab0ybg8rx5p6mloffi9yw8t.hop.clickbank.net/>
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
