Paul writes: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:18 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > That indeed gives some decent results, but the problem remains that the > first suggestion to potential pool joiners is to use a list which has a lot > (at least 270) of defunct servers. > > Petition Ask to change that.
If a small team of folks (hopefully more than 1) wants to work on something to validate the stratum 1 and stratum 2 lists on the Servers web, that would be great. We're getting ready to upgrade our wiki, and that may make this even easier. > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:58 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would make one alteration: > > Instead of ntpdate -dp1, use ntpdate -qp1 > > It's a habit of mine. If I was going for simpler I'd use the "preferred" > sntp. > And yes, symmetric delays are computed out and asymmetric delays are less > easy to reveal. I've been thinking about a way to have sntp emit a user-specified response, so that might do it. Right now, are you looking for data other than 'delay'? -- Harlan Stenn <[email protected]> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
