On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0. Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree. -d
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0. Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree. -d