-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:30:18 +0100
> Von: mouss <[email protected]>
> An: Jeff Weinberger <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Finding the envelope-sender after always_bcc? (SOLVED)
> Jeff Weinberger a écrit :
> >
Hallo Jeff, Salut Mouss
> > I used a pcre: table for smtpd_sender_restrictions and the PREPEND
> > action as follows:
> >
> > main.cf:
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions = check_sender_access
> > pcre:/etc/postfix/smtpd_sender_restrictions.pcre
> >
> > smtpd_sender_restrictions.pcre
> > /^(.*)/ PREPEND X-Envelope-Sender: ${1}
> >
> > this will insert into every message a header "X-Envelope-Sender: "
> > followed by the envelope sender value. It won't pass the
> > envelope-sender as SMTP MAIL FROM (dspam wasn't designed to do that,
>
> dspam gets it via LMTP MAIL FROM, and it will pass it back to postfix
> with SMT MAIL FROM. I have used this in the past and I'm sure others are
> using it now (ping steve?).
>
I hear you :) Have not followed the discussion. So I don't know exactly what
the problem is. I will need to read the thread. However... I have the same
setup as you mouss. I get the mail from Postfix into DSPAM with LMTP and then
inject the message back to Postfix with SMTP. Has worked that way for the last
years. Never had I any issue with that. In the beginning I was using pipe and
then later SMTP for transporting mail to DSPAM but after having issues with
pipe/smtp I switched to LMTP and have not had any issues since then.
@Jeff: If you want, you could quickly address me directly with your DSPAM issue
and save me some time to read the whole thread.
> something in your setup prevents this from
> working but I don' think it is a dspam limitation.
>
> > and
> > until I take the step to a better before-queue filter or something that
> > does, this will work, since all I needed was to capture the
> > envelope-sender).
> >
> > Limited testing shows this to work. There might be cases beyond what I
> > tested that will behave differently than I expect or very oddly.
> >
> > Thanks again!
// Steve
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen:
http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
