On Thursday 17 September 2009 13:02:20 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:59:25PM -0400, fursink wrote:
> > Would the fact that this is 2.3.3... prevent the transport
> > from working at all?
>
> No, and in fact the transport is almost certainly used, but "-o
> syslog_name" does not work as expected in 2.3.3. Rather, the
> syslog_name is inherited from the master(8) daemon, and cannot
> be customized on a per-service basis.
There is no note at postconf.5.html#syslog_name regarding the
changed behavior in later versions. Should there be such a note?
--
Offlist mail to this address is discarded unless
"/dev/rob0" or "not-spam" is in Subject: header
