On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Victor Duchovni <victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:59:25PM -0400, fursink wrote: > >> Would the fact that this is 2.3.3... prevent the transport from working >> at all? > > No, and in fact the transport is almost certainly used, but "-o > syslog_name" does not work as expected in 2.3.3. Rather, the syslog_name > is inherited from the master(8) daemon, and cannot be customized on a > per-service basis. > >> I would think the transport should still function even without >> rate-delay, though > > It does. > >> I will now look into building an upgrade if that's what it takes. >> >> related - if slow transport is working, will the log show >> "postfix/postfix-slow" rather than "postfix/smtp"? > > No. > > -- > Viktor. > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. > > To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit > http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: > <mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> > > If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not > send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put > "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly. >
Than what is the preferred method to verify that a transport is being used for the domain it configured for... - Andrew
