/dev/rob0:
> On Thursday 17 September 2009 13:02:20 Victor Duchovni wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:59:25PM -0400, fursink wrote:
> > > Would the fact that this is 2.3.3... prevent the transport
> > > from working at all?
> >
> > No, and in fact the transport is almost certainly used, but "-o
> > syslog_name" does not work as expected in 2.3.3. Rather, the
> > syslog_name is inherited from the master(8) daemon, and cannot
> > be customized on a per-service basis.
>
> There is no note at postconf.5.html#syslog_name regarding the
> changed behavior in later versions. Should there be such a note?
You mean. all bugfixes get listed in postconf(5)?
Wietse
