On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:59:25PM -0400, fursink wrote:
> Would the fact that this is 2.3.3... prevent the transport from working
> at all?
No, and in fact the transport is almost certainly used, but "-o
syslog_name" does not work as expected in 2.3.3. Rather, the syslog_name
is inherited from the master(8) daemon, and cannot be customized on a
per-service basis.
> I would think the transport should still function even without
> rate-delay, though
It does.
> I will now look into building an upgrade if that's what it takes.
>
> related - if slow transport is working, will the log show
> "postfix/postfix-slow" rather than "postfix/smtp"?
No.
--
Viktor.
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.
To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:[email protected]?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>
If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
