On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:59:25PM -0400, fursink wrote: > Would the fact that this is 2.3.3... prevent the transport from working > at all?
No, and in fact the transport is almost certainly used, but "-o syslog_name" does not work as expected in 2.3.3. Rather, the syslog_name is inherited from the master(8) daemon, and cannot be customized on a per-service basis. > I would think the transport should still function even without > rate-delay, though It does. > I will now look into building an upgrade if that's what it takes. > > related - if slow transport is working, will the log show > "postfix/postfix-slow" rather than "postfix/smtp"? No. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majord...@postfix.org?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.