On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:00:32PM +0100, richard lucassen wrote: > On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 14:28:11 -0600 > Kenneth Marshall <k...@rice.edu> wrote: > > [mlm] > > > I will second that using a real MLM is usually a much, much better > > option that will allow you to prevent collateral damage to your mail > > reputation when there is a delivery problem. For example, when using > > the aliases option, you should only allow the one address/user to send > > mail to the alias or you open up an avenue for spammers to abuse your > > system. > > Ok, thanks guys, you have convinced me to use a mlm. I'll dive into that > matter. I've only played with ezmlm some 10 years ago when I was using > qmail, but I haven't looked at these mlm's ever since. > > Which mlm would you recommend to use for this purpose? I use Debian > Lenny with (of course) Postfix. > > R. >
I will chime in with a recommendation for mailman. It is easy to setup and run. Ken
