> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-
> us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of Peter Evans
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:23 AM
> To: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: RE: Blacklists for you MTA
> 
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
> > > reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
> > > reject_rbl_client t1.dnsbl.net.au,
> > > reject_rbl_client dnsbl.njabl.org,
> > > reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org,
> > > reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org,
> > > reject_rbl_client dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client
> > > psbl.surriel.com, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
> 
>       Why are you querying the same list several times.
> 
>       zen is everything, sbl, xbl, pbl , cbl.abuseat.org, xyzzybl too.
> 
>       so 1 query gets you answers from all the Spamhaus zones.
> 
>       the others I can't answer for because I don't use them, possibly
>       laziness, possibly I don't care enough. I find that postscreen with
> 
> ---------8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> #
> # postscreen
> #
> 
> postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
> postscreen_greet_action = enforce
> 
> postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks,
> cidr:/etc/postfix/postscreen_access
> 
> postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org postscreen_dnsbl_threshold = 1
> 
> ---------8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>       saves so much time and headaches.
> 
> > However Barracudacentral.org is a good list.
> 
>       Must not make snarky comments here.
> 
> 
>       P

I use these in this order and swap barracuda & spamcop on different machines so 
I hit them evenly and don’t over use one over the other.   I keep based on 
track record this order so that I avoid additional queries thereby speeding up 
the process on a reject.  
        reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org,
        reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net,
        reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
        reject_rbl_client psbl.surriel.com,

Reply via email to