On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:31:47 -0700 [email protected] wrote: > This seems counter intuitive. So I am better off having a catch-all > account that random emailers will fill up than not having one?
No! Even though you don't have to have a mailbox to fill up (you can direct catch-all to /dev/null) this is still a bad idea. If someone sends you an important message at [email protected] it will be silently ignored. If you don't have a catch-all the message will bounce and the sender will realize that he made a typo and resend it. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain System Administrator, Vex.Net http://www.Vex.Net/ IM:[email protected] VoIP: sip:[email protected]
