On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:49:35 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hans Glomme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> - reciept- and reading confirmation > > There is no way to be sure someone has really read your mail unless > they've said so, and anyway, a request for automatic confirmation can be > construed as an intrusion on privacy. If PowerMail should support this > feature in a future version, I would instantly turn it off. This kind of > information is nobody's business unless I decide it is.
You are right ;) But my business partner normally confirm it that they read. But what you can do and what the most server understood is, that you can ask the server for a delivery confirmation. Of course you never can be sure that the recipient has read your mail, understood it or put it unread in the trash. > >> - Threading > > I've never used a mail client that supported threading, so I don't know > _what_ I miss -- but I cannot say that I miss it. All I hear is people > complaining about threading not working reliably. For example, I have > subscribed to several mailing lists in digest mode. When I am replying > to a message within a digest, I am necessarily breaking the thread; > there's nothing I can do about it. Well if you got 500 Mails each day from different lists and searching for a special theme or want follow a longer thread you will know what I mean ;) Think it's very exhausting if you don't have such a feature. > >> - In some clients also the possibility to filter for mailing lists > > Maybe I don't understand what you are missing, but I have filters set up > for all the mailing lists I have subscribed to. What is it that filters > should do that they don't do already? Ok show me the filter for "list-id" ;) Because the list-id is allways the same address. In some lists you have the list mail into cc in other ones from an also in reply to. -- Greetings Hans
