Watts Bar replies the same.

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mathiasen, Glenn D.
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 12:33 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Powernet: Quick Posting Question

 

Monticello does not require instruments to be source checked following a
down posting survey.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of John Sukosky
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 10:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Duane Boone
Subject: Powernet: Quick Posting Question

Surry Power Station would like to know if you require survey instruments
used to down post High Radiation Areas to be source checked after the
down posting survey is completed?

 

At Surry, survey instruments used to down post HRA are source checked
after the down posting survey is completed.

 

Thanks,

 

 

John M. Sukosky, CHP

Health Physicist III

Radiological Protection, Surry Power Station

 

Dominion Generation

Phone: 757-365-2594; Internal: 8-798-2594

Fax: 757-365-2668

Pager: 804-273-3030 3636; E-mail: [email protected]

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 7:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Powernet: Quick Question (Outage Dose Goal Revision?)

 

Under these conditions Palo Verde would convene an ALARA Committee
meeting and revise the outage dose goal upward; conversely, if
conditions were much lower than anticipated we would use the same
process to lower the goal.  Fortunately, we have done the latter
numerous times.  The upward revision based on emergent work / scope
change is also approved by the ALARA Committee as a stretch goal (amount
estimated above the original estimate).  While the final reported RFO
dose would include all work, the ALARA incentives offered to employees
are based on the original dose estimation; thereby. not penalizing (and
disincentivizing) them because of conditions beyond their control.

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: Quick Question (Outage Dose Goal Revision?)

 

At SONGS, the outage dose goal is set prior to the outage like all
sites.  At the onset of the outage, we had  higher than expected dose
rates (crud burst with new generators) and revised our outage dose goal
accordingly.   Would your site have revised the outage goal is similar
event occurred?   

In addition, during the outage it has been determined that additional
emergent work will be required to support increased inspections on our
steam generators which is dose impacting.  Would your site revise your
outage dose goal a second time based upon the increased emergent work
expected?  Or would your site maintain your revised dose goal as is and
track the emergent dose as separate goal? 

Thanks, 

"Stevie Ray" Vaughan 
[email protected] 
----------------------------------- Powernet - a service of the Health
Physics Society Power Reactor Section Powernet archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Reply to:
[email protected] If Questions, contact Mike Russell, CHP at
[email protected] 

--- NOTICE ---

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
confidential, privileged or proprietary information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
the original and any copy or printout.  Unintended recipients are
prohibited from making any other use of this e-mail.  Although we have
taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this
e-mail, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from the
use of this e-mail or attachments, or for any delay or errors or
omissions in the contents which result from e-mail transmission.

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message contains information
which may be legally confidential and/or privileged and does not in any
case represent a firm ENERGY COMMODITY bid or offer relating thereto
which binds the sender without an additional express written
confirmation to that effect. The information is intended solely for the
individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is
unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you
have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.

Reply via email to