My company won't upgrade computers, much less software. Getting a new copy of Windows even is like pulling teeth. Our interns work on one P266 (two people). I wish there was an upgrade for CEOs.
We've had 99 SE for maybe four months, but we bought it new--two copies in fact. So I guess that means they still make it. Michael Badillo From: Ian Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2003/09/18 Thu AM 08:29:43 EDT To: Protel EDA Forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [PEDA] P99SE has Altzheimers' ? On 10:00 PM 18/09/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >Yeah! > >I don't know about you guys, but my company just dropped 16 Grand on 99 >SE. We can't possibly afford to upgrade to DXP. If Protel decides not to >support SE, we're really hosed. Guess it's a good thing I found this user >group (or is it more like a support group?). If "just" means recently then you must have bought 2nd hand copies? Otherwise you would have paid for a P99SE migration pack, which includes DXP when you have the need/want/hardware to run it. Or am I wrong - can you still buy new P99SE licesnses? Otherwise the quote upgrade price is about $2500. Lets assume a designers on-cost is between 25 and 50 dollars per hour - 25 to 50 hours of improved productivity will pay for it, one week. So, the question then is how long will I have to be running DXP to get 25 to 50 hours of productivity improvement? That is the real question, not the actual cost. But this is a harder question to answer. I have been a little disingenuous here, I haven't included the learning curve which is significant in one area - queries. Add a few days for that. Ian * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *