Thanks for the input, guys. *Lots* of interesting stuff to read in this thread, and I'm gonna try to ruminate on all of it and respond at the end of the day with something long and thoughtful of my own.
Cheers, Andrew On Jul 13, 9:36 am, Cantrelle Vincent <vcantre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > This is just a simple question related to the fact that everywhere I > look, especially on some french forums for developers, > it seems that the number of users of the jQuery library is growing / > increasing, and it's not really the case for Prototype. > I have always prefered to work with Prototype.js, but I must say that > sometimes I feel a little bit worried. > May be I'm wrong, I hope I'm wrong, and so I hope that I have a > "truncated" view of the situation, and that the number of users for > Prototype.js is still high enough, and the "motivation" of the core > team too, so that this library will be still maintained / improved in > the futur. > Can somebody give me a hint about that ? > > Thanks in advance, > Vincent. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
