In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Your points may be valid and correct, but you only echoed what was originally
> stated anyway. The "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" IS part of the body, not the RCPT
> TO: The [EMAIL PROTECTED] stuff started when someone else said they'd like
> to bounce that too, but I just answered that.
I echoed what others had said, yes. But I had to pull it all together because
people were not grasping what was actually going on.
> Since I started this thread I can tell you without question what it's about
> and [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't any part of it. I want to reject mail being
> sent to certain valid usernames, such as my database. I'd also like to bounce
> some mail to nonvalid usernames without accepting and bouncing afterward since
> they only double bounce anyway.
To do this, then it requires qmail-smtpd to know everything that qmail-send
does. It requires a major rethink and rewriting of the qmail system.
We'll have to see what dbj comes up with for Qmail-II - we know that many of
us would like to see such a feature.
> The problem with accepting and trashing the messages is that if mail is sent
> to the database (ferinstance) I'd have to filter out what is junk mail and
> what's valid - like cron results.
If you are in control of the local delivery then you already can control
who sends mail to your database. Why can't you use procmail?
Paul.
--
Email pgregg at tibus.net | Email pgregg at nyx.net | Eight out of every
Technical Director | System Administrator | five people are math
The Internet Business Ltd | Nyx Public Access Internet | illiterates.
http://www.tibus.net | http://www.nyx.net | - Anon.
