-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks like the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we restart the logo contest?
Marlon On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever decided on >> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to >> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone >> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo? > > I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see a few > variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written one I saw on > the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although accurate to a white label). > > Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the text > were neater (but still script). > > I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus. > > Ross -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU= =Ehw/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
