On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote: >> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have >>> the last one on this list. >> >> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under: >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/ >> >> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer): >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg >> >> - white label design by Scott Wilson: >> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png >> >> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help >> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list >> too). > > I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or 3 > with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice! > > Ross > > >> >> Ate >> >>> >>> -Matt >>> >>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks >>>> like >>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with >>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go >>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we >>>> restart the logo contest? >>>> >>>> >>>> Marlon >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever >>>>>> decided on >>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to >>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone >>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo? >>>>> >>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see >>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written >>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although >>>>> accurate >>>>> to a white label). >>>>> >>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the >>>>> text were neater (but still script). >>>>> >>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus. >>>>> >>>>> Ross >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) >>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>>> >>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC >>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm >>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d >>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH >>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf >>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU= >>>> =Ehw/ >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> >> >
