They all look kinda too black for me. Simplicity is good. My $0.02, Hadrian
On Apr 7, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Scott Wilson wrote: > > On 7 Apr 2011, at 12:38, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote: >>> On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>> I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have >>>> the last one on this list. >>> >>> I've put the initial logos we discussed before under: >>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/ >>> >>> - three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer): >>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg >>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg >>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg >>> >>> - white label design by Scott Wilson: >>> http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png >>> >>> Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help >>> designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list >>> too). >> >> I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2 and/or 3 >> with those of Scotts white label interpretation. > > I really like #2 in terms of how its framed in a kind of app icon - nice! > >> >> Ross >> >> >>> >>> Ate >>> >>>> >>>> -Matt >>>> >>>> On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>>> >>>>> Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks >>>>> like >>>>> the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with >>>>> Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go >>>>> with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we >>>>> restart the logo contest? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Marlon >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >>>>>> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>>>>>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever >>>>>>> decided on >>>>>>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to >>>>>>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone >>>>>>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see >>>>>> a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written >>>>>> one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although >>>>>> accurate >>>>>> to a white label). >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the >>>>>> text were neater (but still script). >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ross >>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) >>>>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ >>>>> >>>>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC >>>>> YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm >>>>> OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d >>>>> zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH >>>>> am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf >>>>> UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU= >>>>> =Ehw/ >>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>> >>> >> >
