I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have the last one on this list.
-Matt On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce" <[email protected]> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks like >the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with >Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go >with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we >restart the logo contest? > > >Marlon > > >On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: >>> I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever >>>decided on >>> a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to >>> the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone >>> want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo? >> >> I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see >>a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written >>one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although accurate >>to a white label). >> >> Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the >>text were neater (but still script). >> >> I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus. >> >> Ross >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > >iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC >YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm >OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d >zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH >am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf >UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU= >=Ehw/ >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
