On 07/04/2011 08:36, Ate Douma wrote:
On 04/05/2011 04:47 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
I think it would be best to restart the logo contest since we didn't have
the last one on this list.
I've put the initial logos we discussed before under:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/
- three initial concepts made by Rolf van der Steen (Hippo UI designer):
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_1.jpg
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_2.jpg
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave_logo_concept_3.jpg
- white label design by Scott Wilson:
http://people.apache.org/~ate/rave/logo/rave.png
Rolf van der Steen from Hippo also is available for further help
designing/refining the Rave logo (I'll ask him to sign up to this list
too).
I'd love to see something from Rolf merging his ideas in concept 2
and/or 3 with those of Scotts white label interpretation.
Ross
Ate
-Matt
On 4/5/11 10:31 AM, "Marlon Pierce"<[email protected]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Reviewing the old AWESOME emails (subject: "logo contest"), it looks
like
the white label logo had support. This is fine with me. I agree with
Ross that the handwritten one needed some clean up. Do we want to go
with this? If so, who has some resources to improve? If not, do we
restart the logo contest?
Marlon
On 4/1/11 9:57 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 01/04/2011 14:34, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
I was looking through list archives and didn't see that we ever
decided on
a logo. I think it would be good to get one finalized and committed to
the site repository so that we can begin to finish the website. Anyone
want to narrow the candidates or propose a new logo?
I'm happy to narrow down to the "white label" versions. I'd like to see
a few variations on that theme. I wasn't too keen on the hand written
one I saw on the list as it seemed a little "scruffy" (although
accurate
to a white label).
Maybe it would work if the ASF feather was "writing" the label and the
text were neater (but still script).
I don't know, I'll leave it to the design gurus.
Ross
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmyfUAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDMJMIAJK3yPeqWTFxjBz7PoHNGpuC
YmxsRdzhwvFeFpHQt28dWWzP/tHO5Icd0QiZxRbCwTPbKpbd7/UAKludigTYbOBm
OgbNXdY1nMKVzK/hQIxOQwIknYmOcRn4RBBht6KWjTFXaqdm6khsdWruQo+2yw9d
zfYFO1iO7wzTRvdxy0HJ32PTudOJth7IT9fT+N9E/CeG7aIjUrscveivwgJb+TPH
am0HLmQhRwzQ2iGzRN+8Jv5Ew0cUJkt1CkNOcSzzyinnqoNCY+/aJjwyQ4rkRAcf
UVlNJ9ikQwQcdo+JLsgkWx5Ufls4LFMiynQzJNGFCn6n+3seWAea7BD1kgGcpdU=
=Ehw/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
